Draft 1 · for discussion only · this will not be the final allocation  ·  all 54 draft bundles →
KenyaBuy African Initiative · Right of Supply
Draft 1 · for discussion
AU STC-FMAEPI
Draft 1 · this will not be the final allocation

The USD 620 bn Africa sends abroad

Africa imports USD 709 bn of goods a year. USD 620 bn of it is sourced from outside the continent, against about USD 89 bn traded within Africa. USD 136.75 bn is measured government procurement. This document proposes a first, correctable product bundle for Kenya — and states plainly what it does not yet know.

USD 709 bn
Total continental imports, 2023
USD 620 bn
Sourced off-continent — the prize
USD 136.75 bn
Measured government procurement
≈USD 89 bn
Intra-African trade today (~12.5%)
18
Draft 1 candidate lines for Kenya
The Minister’s brief · for John Mbadi · Kenya
Minister Mbadi, Kenya holds what no other African nation can claim: the world's single largest export of finished black tea — roughly 523,000 tonnes in 2023, processed at home across some 66 KTDA factories serving more than 500,000 smallholders, and sold through Mombasa, the world's largest CTC auction. This is not raw leaf leaving your shores; it is a finished good, and the continent is already buying — Egypt alone took 86.90 million kilogrammes in 2024, with Sudan, Morocco and Ghana behind it. Africa is the world's second-largest tea-importing region by value, and this is Kenya's defensible claim to bring home. The Right of Supply grants you a twenty-five-year first right to supply that demand, disciplined by Match-or-Release, so it is never a subsidy and never a captive contract — you hold it only while you earn it. This is Draft 1, deliberately provisional. Your correction, Minister, is the next move.
Right of Supply · Draft 1 · for the Minister of Finance, Kenya
01 · Correspondence
From the Chair · to John Mbadi, Minister of Finance

A first draft, put in front of you to be corrected

Draft 1 · Right of Supply · Kenya · from the Office of the Chair, AU STC-FMAEPI

Minister Mbadi,

I write to you not as a secretariat, but as a colleague — one of fifty-four ministers who signs the same painful cheque every year. Africa buys USD 709 bn of goods annually, and USD 620 bn of it leaves this continent. Some of that money is yours, some of it is mine, and almost none of it needs to go where it goes.

What is fixed — and what is yours to change

Two kinds of statement sit in this document, and they carry different weight. The continental spine is fixed: USD 709 bn of total imports; USD 620 bn sourced off-continent; approximately USD 89 bn traded within Africa; USD 136.75 bn of measured government procurement inside an estimated USD 207 bn that our governments influence. Those figures are measured, reconciled and not on the table. Everything else — the product bundle proposed for Kenya — is Draft 1: a first pass drawn from your country’s productive-capacity audit, printed precisely so that you can correct it.

Why Kenya is in this room

Kenya's strongest endowment is finished black tea. It is the world's single largest exporter, producing approximately 523,000 tonnes in 2023, processed domestically into made tea across roughly 66 KTDA factories serving more than 500,000 smallholders and traded through the Mombasa auction, the world's largest CTC tea auction — a rare instance of an African agricultural flagship that leaves the country finished rather than raw, and one for which continental demand is real, with Egypt importing 86.90 million kg of Kenyan tea in 2024 and Sudan, Morocco and Ghana as further African buyers. The honest constraint is that the value tier has not been captured: value-added tea was 28.90 million kg in 2024, just 5% of total exports against a government target of 50% by 2027, so the branded and bagged margin continues to accrue to re-exporters elsewhere, while the within-Africa-sourced share of African tea imports has fallen from around 55% in 2005 to about 40% by 2020.

The instrument — two layers, both required

Pre-allocation. The African Union pre-allocates 25-year supply rights per product category to designated African producers. That is the fairness layer — the reason every member state, including those still rebuilding, holds a bundle at all.

Match-or-Release. When any of our governments procures, the designated continental supplier is shown the open-market quote and must match it on price, quality, warranty and service in a single window — or release the buyer instantly, no penalty, no delay. I have called it the Cell Phone Test: nobody in this room is asked to buy a worse phone. This is a right to match, never a right to exclude. Your procurement autonomy is untouched, and there is no pooled purchasing, no central buyer, no buyers’ club.

What I ask of you

One hour, and your pen. Mark what is wrong: the lines that do not belong to Kenya, the capability this draft understates, the buyer it misreads. The response instrument at the end of this document takes a minute to complete, and Draft 2 will show, line by line, which member state asked for each change. Your correction is not an objection to the method — it is the method.

Neal RijkenbergMinister of Finance, Kingdom of Eswatini · Chair, AU STC-FMAEPI
02 · Executive summary
The whole case on one page

A fixed continental prize, and a draft bundle for Kenya

Right of Supply · in one read

The spine is settled. The bundle is the conversation.

709USD bn total imports
620USD bn sourced off-continent
136.75USD bn measured procurement
18draft bundle lines

The prize. Africa imports USD 709 bn of goods a year. USD 620 bn of that is sourced from outside the continent, against roughly USD 89 bn traded within it — about 12.5 per cent. The off-continent figure is the market available for progressive import substitution, and it is the denominator this instrument works from.

The beachhead. USD 136.75 bn is measured government procurement, parastatals included, sitting inside an estimated USD 207 bn of government-influenced demand once contractor-imported tenders are counted. Government is where a signature can redirect demand, so government is where the instrument begins.

The instrument. Two layers. The African Union pre-allocates 25-year supply rights per product category — the fairness layer. Match-or-Release disciplines it: the designated supplier matches the open-market quote on price, quality, warranty and service, or releases the buyer instantly. This is not pooled procurement. There is no central buyer, no aggregated tender and no buyers’ club. Purchase by purchase, country by country.

Kenya’s draft bundle. 18 candidate product lines are proposed, drawn from the country’s productive-capacity audit, led on present capability by Black tea (made/CTC), Cut flowers/roses. Per-line figures are gross continental import demand — market context, sourced, never a statement of what this state will supply. The tier mix is 2 continental anchor · 6 strong contender · 6 emerging · 2 aspirational · 2 grey.

What is draft and what is not. The spine — USD 709 bn, USD 620 bn, USD 136.75 bn, USD 89 bn — is fixed. The bundle is Draft 1 and expected to change. The claim value for Kenya is deliberately not stated: it arrives only after the screens and the allocation are resolved, at Draft 2.

03 · Draft provenance
What is fixed · what is draft

Two kinds of statement sit in this document, and they are not equal

The most common way an instrument like this fails is that a provisional product list is read as a settled entitlement, or a measured continental figure is read as negotiable. This page separates them before anything else is claimed.

Fixed · not draft · not negotiable

The macro spine

Measured from UN Comtrade via the Africa Trade Intelligence Master Database v3 on a 2023 basis, reconciled across all 54 member states.

  • USD 709 bn — total continental imports, 2023.
  • USD 620 bn — sourced from outside the continent. The prize.
  • USD 89 bn — traded within Africa today, about 12.5 per cent.
  • USD 136.75 bn — measured government procurement, inside an estimated USD 207 bn government-influenced.

These figures do not move because a bundle changes.

Draft 1 · for discussion · will change

The product bundle

The 18 candidate lines proposed for Kenya below.

  • Assembled from the state’s Productive Capacity & Continental Supply Audit.
  • Allocation between states is unresolved. Several states currently claim some of the same lines; those lines are marked.
  • The screens that reduce a candidate bundle to a claim have not yet been applied here.
  • No claim value is stated for Kenya. That figure belongs to Draft 2.

The Minister’s correction is not an objection to the method. It is the method.

The rule this document will not break

Per-line values are gross continental import demand — what the whole continent buys in that category from all sources. They are market context. They are never a statement of what Kenya will supply, and they are never added together into a headline. Summing overlapping candidate lines is precisely the error that produces a figure many times a country’s GDP, and it is renounced here.

What a line value means

The continent imported this much of this product category in 2023, from everywhere.

What it does not mean

That Kenya will supply it, could supply it tomorrow, or is entitled to that revenue.

04 · The size of the prize
709 → 620 → 136.75 / ≈207

USD 620 bn leaves the continent every year

Africa imports USD 709 bn. USD 620 bn comes from outside the continent; about USD 89 bn is sourced within Africa. The Right of Supply begins with the off-continent prize, then narrows to the government demand a signature can redirect.

USD 709 bn
Total continental imports — all buyers, all sources
The market
USD 620 bn
From outside Africa — the import-substitution prize
The prize
USD 136.75 bn
Measured direct sovereign imports · parastatals included
Band A
≈USD 207 bn total
Government-influenced once contractor-imported tenders are counted · estimated
Band B
18 lines
Kenya’s Draft 1 candidate bundle · claim value resolved at Draft 2
Draft 1

Funnel widths are indicative. Band A is measured at USD 136.75 bn (2024). Band B is inferred from the one-third ratio applied to USD 620 bn, giving approximately USD 207 bn of total government-influenced demand. The final row is a count of candidate lines, not a value: no monetary claim is made for Kenya at Draft 1.

SCREEN 01

Government first

Begin where a state, agency or parastatal controls the tender or directly imports the good.

SCREEN 02

Off-continent

Substitute imports from beyond Africa. Do not displace an existing African producer.

SCREEN 03

Industrial

Allocate a finished good that requires plant, capability and jobs — not a raw base.

SCREEN 04

Balance

Size the right near what the member buys so the continental allocation can net out.

05 · Government beachhead
Two bands · one honest market

USD 136.75 bn measured. About USD 207 bn government-influenced.

The measured floor already includes state-owned buyers. The estimate above it captures goods specified by government but imported through EPC contractors, construction firms and other delivery vehicles that customs cannot label as sovereign.

Band A · measured floor
USD 136.75 bn

Direct sovereign imports across 62 categories and 48 states. Parastatals and controlled agencies are already present.

NNPCGASCOAICNCPBKEMSANMSPCT
Band B · estimated tender layer
≈USD 207 bn

Total government-influenced demand, applying the one-third ratio to USD 620 bn. The extension above the measured floor is an estimate based on that ratio, not a customs measurement.

Parastatals, confirmed

The sovereign database classifies buyers as monopoly, controlled or predominant, together with functions where a single state entity is the only lawful buyer, each tied to named agencies. Energy includes NNPC and national oil companies; strategic food includes GASC, OAIC and NCPB; public health includes KEMSA, NMS and PCT. Central banks, electoral commissions, defence ministries, public works and roads authorities complete the government layer. The question is not whether state-owned enterprises are counted. They are. The question is which contractor-imported tenders sit above the directly measured floor.

The seven sovereign pillars · USD bn, 2024

Energy & utilities71.65
Strategic agriculture & food27.03
Public health & pharmaceuticals14.02
Digital sovereignty & telecoms8.53
Infrastructure & transport6.60
Currency, governance & elections5.54
Defence & national security3.40

The direct sovereign floor

Fuel, grain, medicines, defence and other lines imported by a state or controlled agency.

The
tender

The contractor-imported layer

The hospital’s tiles, the state road’s rebar and the utility’s pipe. Government specifies the finished material even when a contractor clears customs.

06 · Allocation logic
Two layers · three principles

Allocation chooses the finished product — not merely the resource

The instrument only works with both of its layers in place. Drop either and it breaks: pre-allocation without discipline becomes a cartel; discipline without pre-allocation leaves nothing to build against.

Layer one · fairness
Pre-allocated supply rights

The African Union pre-allocates 25-year supply rights per HS6 product category to designated African producers. This is why every member state — including those rebuilding — holds a bundle. It creates the demand certainty a plant can be financed against.

Layer two · competitive discipline
Match-or-Release

The Cell Phone Test. When a government procures, the designated continental supplier is shown the open-market quote and must match it on price, quality, warranty and service in a single window — or release the buyer instantly, with no penalty and no delay.

What this instrument is not

It is not pooled procurement. There is no central buyer, no aggregated tender and no buyers’ club. Every purchase remains purchase-by-purchase and country-by-country, and Kenya’s procurement autonomy is untouched. It is a right to match a price, never a right to exclude a competitor. Local content means made anywhere on the African continent, ramping from 10 per cent to 100 per cent over ten years.

Principle one

The finished-product test

Allocate what the tender actually specifies. A government does not buy winding wire to repair motors; it buys motors. A hospital fit-out buys sanitaryware, not raw kaolin.

Pass: electric motors · sanitaryware
Fail: winding wire · raw kaolin
Principle two

Scale-matching

The largest use of a material anchors to the largest endowment-holder. Smaller holders take a niche, higher-value product rather than a continental bulk line.

Scale anchor: bulk copper cable → Zambia
Niche: motors → Botswana
Principle three

Endowment-combination

The strongest claim brings two endowments together in one plant. The allocation rewards the industrial combination, not the mere presence of either resource.

Eswatini: iron + anthracite → one niche smelter

The South Sudan Principle

Fragile and rebuilding states hold aspirational allocations. These are not near-term capacity claims and must never be read as such. They are the demand certainty against which capability is built — the reason an investor can underwrite a first plant in a state that does not yet have one. A member state is not excluded from the continental market because it is currently unable to serve it.

07 · Discipline
What should come off the list

A credible bundle is defined as much by what it refuses

Every exclusion names the screen it fails. This is the visible evidence that the bundle was reasoned rather than padded — and the reasoning is drawn from Kenya’s own capability audit.

Titanium minerals (ilmenite, rutile, zircon), HS 2614

Kenya exported titanium wholly as raw concentrate with no domestic titanium processing, and the audit records Base Titanium's wind-down of the Kwale operation through 2024 on ore depletion, with output roughly halved from 198,469 tonnes in 2024 to 101,000 tonnes in 2025 and mineral export value falling from KSh 17bn to KSh 7.8bn. The audit classes the category as emerging and declining, and marginal within Africa.

Raw base · industrial screen

Gold, HS 7108

Production is confined to the largely artisanal Migori belt at 329 kg in 2025, exported raw with no beneficiation. The audit marks the category GREY / insufficient for want of reliable continental-trade evidence.

Raw base · evidence screen

Gemstones (tsavorite, ruby), HS 7103

A genuine endowment at 2.17 million carats of rough output in 2025, but exported raw into a niche continental demand profile. The audit marks the category GREY / insufficient.

Raw base · evidence screen

Cut flowers and roses, HS 0603

Kenya is the world's third-largest exporter and the leading rose supplier to the EU at a 38% market share, but the audit records continental demand as marginal because the trade is EU-oriented, with roughly 50% sold via the Royal FloraHolland Dutch auctions. It is an anchor globally and only emerging continentally.

Scale-matching · continental demand

Coffee (green, premium) HS 0901 and avocado (fresh) HS 0804

Both carry established global positions — premium Arabica exports of US$246 million in 2023 and Africa's largest avocado production at 542,278 tonnes in 2023 — yet both leave the country raw or semi-processed and the audit records continental demand as marginal, with trade oriented to the EU, Middle East, United States and Asia.

Raw base · continental demand

Pharmaceuticals, iron and steel, and edible oils — feedstock inversion

Kenya holds the largest pharmaceutical base in the EAC and about 50% of the COMESA market, but formulates and packages from imported active pharmaceutical ingredients rather than making them, and the World Bank's 2020 Pharmaceutical Diagnostic notes local output meets only about 30% of domestic demand. Steel re-rolling depends on imported billet and scrap and edible oils on imported crude palm, which the audit flags as eroding cost-competitiveness and rules-of-origin qualification.

Capability inversion
08 · Endowment
What Kenya actually holds

The endowment, read honestly

Drawn from the Productive Capacity & Continental Supply Audit for Kenya. Capability tiers reflect installed capability, not the mere presence of a resource.

Kenya's deepest endowment is agricultural. It is the world's largest exporter of black tea, producing approximately 523,000 tonnes in 2023 (Tea Board of Kenya), with FAO recording 542,561 tonnes in 2022, placing it among the top three to four global producers. Unusually for an African agricultural export, the crop is processed domestically into made tea across roughly 66 KTDA factories serving more than 500,000 smallholders, and traded through the Mombasa auction, the world's largest CTC tea auction. The mechanism behind this position is a combination of equatorial highlands and volcanic soils, a smallholder aggregation model, and the auction institution itself. Alongside tea, Kenya is the world's third-largest cut-flower exporter and the leading rose supplier to the European Union with a 38% market share (Kenya Flower Council), exports reaching US$660.8 million in 2023 (UN Comtrade/WITS); it is Africa's largest avocado producer at 542,278 tonnes in 2023 (FAOSTAT) and sixth globally; and its premium Arabica coffee exports were US$246 million in 2023.

The second endowment is energy. Kenya runs one of the world's greenest grids and is a global leader in geothermal generation: installed geothermal capacity was 943.7 MW in June 2024 (EPRA), generating 5,707.71 GWh, or 41.71% of grid energy in FY2023/24. Total interconnected installed capacity was approximately 3,200 MW, with renewables supplying roughly 85 to 90% of electricity. Kenya ranks seventh globally among geothermal producers, and the Olkaria complex is among the largest geothermal fields in the world. Lake Turkana Wind Power, at 310 MW, is the largest single wind farm in Africa. Hydro installed capacity was 872.4 MW in June 2024. Cheap, clean baseload power is the foundation of a credible green-industrialisation cost argument.

The third is position and industrial base. The Port of Mombasa handled 1.62 million TEU and 35.98 million tonnes of cargo in 2023 (KNBS/KPA) against a capacity of roughly 2.1 to 2.3 million TEU, serving a hinterland of more than 120 million people across Uganda, Rwanda, Burundi, South Sudan, eastern DRC, Somalia and northern Tanzania via the Northern Corridor, with dedicated terminals for soda ash, clinker, titanium and grain and the Standard Gauge Railway running inland. Kenya has the most diversified manufacturing base in East Africa: cement grinding capacity of approximately 16 Mt per year and installed clinker capacity of approximately 10 Mt per year across five producers (KAM 2024–25); the largest pharmaceutical manufacturing base in the EAC and the largest producer in COMESA, supplying about 50% of the regional market; and soda ash from Tata Chemicals Magadi, Africa's largest producer, at 289,610 tonnes in 2025. Kenya ranks 91st on the Economic Complexity Index, has improved three positions over the past decade, and is described by the Atlas of Economic Complexity as slightly more complex than expected for its income level. It is also markedly intra-African in orientation: Africa took roughly 44.4% of export revenues in Q3 2023 (KNBS), and those regional exports are disproportionately manufactured goods.

The endowment in depth

Kenya is not a globally significant minerals producer, and its extractive base has just thinned further. Soda ash is the flagship: Tata Chemicals Magadi, operating at Lake Magadi since 1911, is Africa's largest soda ash producer, with national production of 289,610 tonnes in 2025 (value KSh 4.0 billion), up 9.3% (Economic Survey 2026, KNBS); over 95% is exported as a genuine processed mineral (trona to soda ash, HS 2836) to SE Asia, the Indian subcontinent, Africa and the Middle East. Titanium minerals (ilmenite, rutile, zircon) were the dominant mineral export until Base Titanium wound down its Kwale operation through 2024 on ore depletion — output roughly halved from 198,469 tonnes (2024) to 101,000 tonnes (2025) and mineral export value fell from KSh 17bn to KSh 7.8bn — and over its 11-year life Base exported 5.2 million tonnes (3.9 Mt ilmenite, 804,000 t rutile, 295,000 t zircon), supplying some 7-8% of US rutile imports, all as raw concentrate with no domestic processing. Gold from the Migori belt, largely artisanal, reached 329 kg (KSh 3.3bn, 2025) and rough gemstone output was 2.17 million carats (2025); fluorspar in the Kerio Valley is largely dormant, and rare earths/niobium at Mrima Hill and coal in the Mui Basin remain undeveloped.

Energy is Kenya's standout industrial asset. Installed geothermal capacity was 943.7 MW (June 2024, EPRA), generating 5,707.71 GWh, or 41.71% of grid energy in FY2023/24; total interconnected installed capacity was about 3,200 MW, and renewables supply roughly 85-90% of electricity. Kenya ranks 7th globally among geothermal producers (ThinkGeoEnergy 2023), the Olkaria complex is among the largest geothermal fields in the world, and IRENA data show capacity surging from 45 MW in 2000 to about 984 MW in 2023. Lake Turkana Wind Power (310 MW) is the largest single wind farm in Africa, supplying about 15-17% of installed capacity, and hydro adds 872.4 MW. There has been no operating crude oil refinery since the Mombasa refinery converted to storage in 2013, and the Turkana/Lokichar oil discoveries are not at commercial production scale. Cheap, clean baseload power is a credible green-industrialisation cost advantage, but the grid is small, and about 16% transmission losses plus 812.8 GWh curtailed in FY2023/24 cap deliverable industrial power today.

Agriculture is Kenya's deepest endowment. Tea (black, CTC) is the world's number-one export — production about 523,000 tonnes (2023, Tea Board of Kenya), with FAO recording 542,561 tonnes (2022) — processed domestically into made tea via about 66 KTDA factories serving 500,000-plus smallholders, though value-added tea exports were only 28.90 million kg in 2024, just 5% of the total, against a government target of 50% by 2027. Cut flowers and roses make Kenya the world's third-largest exporter and the leading EU rose supplier at a 38% market share (Kenya Flower Council), with roughly 50% sold via the Royal FloraHolland Dutch auctions and exports of US$660.8 million (2023) produced in the Naivasha and Mt Kenya clusters. Premium Arabica coffee exported US$246 million (2023), and avocado output of 542,278 tonnes (2023, FAOSTAT) makes Kenya Africa's largest producer and 6th globally, with exports of about US$159 million (2024); macadamia, dairy and pyrethrum round out the base, but processing depth is the recurring weakness, as most agro-exports leave raw or semi-processed.

Kenya has the most diversified — if shallow — manufacturing base in East Africa (7.6% of GDP, 2023), employing 352,654 and standing as the largest private-sector employer. Cement is the industrial spearhead, with about 16 Mt/yr grinding and about 10 Mt/yr clinker capacity across five producers (Bamburi/now Amsons, National Cement/Devki-Simba, Mombasa Cement, EAPCC, Savannah) against domestic consumption of about 8.5-9 Mt. Pharmaceuticals form the largest manufacturing base in the EAC and the largest producer in COMESA, supplying about 50% of the regional market through firms such as Cosmos, Universal Corporation (WHO-prequalified), Dawa, Lab & Allied and Biodeal, though local output meets only about 30% of domestic demand; steel (Devki, Blue Nile, Tononoka, Mabati Rolling Mills) depends on imported scrap and billet, while food and beverage anchors include East African Breweries (Diageo), Bidco and Kapa Oil, and assembly runs through Isuzu EA, Kenya Vehicle Manufacturers and Mobius. On human capital, the working-age population is about 30 million with formal wage employment of 3.14 million and labour-force participation of 66.7%; Nairobi ("Silicon Savannah") is sub-Saharan Africa's leading tech and fintech cluster, hosting about 15% of Africa's fintech startups and securing US$482 million in venture capital in Q1 2024. Infrastructure hinges on the Port of Mombasa (1.62 million TEU and 35.98 million tonnes of cargo, 2023; capacity about 2.1-2.3 million TEU), which serves a hinterland of more than 120 million people via the Northern Corridor and the Standard Gauge Railway, with JKIA the regional air-cargo hub critical to perishable horticulture.

Economic complexity & comparative advantage

Kenya ranks 91st on the Economic Complexity Index and has become more complex over the past decade, improving 3 positions on the back of export diversification (Atlas of Economic Complexity, Harvard Growth Lab); the Atlas notes Kenya is "slightly more complex than expected for its income level" and projects about 3.4% annual growth to 2034, placing it among the more complex economies in East Africa. On UNIDO's Competitive Industrial Performance Index it ranked 115/152 (CIP 2020), top within the EAC but well behind Egypt (64) and South Africa (52), and its manufacturing export structure is 42.9% resource-based and only 5.5% high-tech. On UNCTAD's Productive Capacities Index it scored 30.8 (2022), rank 149/193, above the sub-Saharan average of 27.9 but below South Africa (42.7) and Egypt (36.7).

Products with a revealed comparative advantage above 1 and real export volume are black tea (a very high RCA), cut flowers, coffee, and — within Africa — cement, soda ash and light manufactures. The Atlas product-space flags feasible diversification into processed foods, packaging and higher-value horticulture adjacencies, consistent with the recurring pattern that Kenya's competitiveness lies in finishing agricultural and light-industrial goods for regional markets rather than in global high-technology segments.

The trump card · the single strongest continental position

Black tea (HS 0902) is the one category where Kenya holds an unambiguous, multi-source-confirmed right to be Africa's designated continental supplier. Kenya is the world's single largest exporter of black tea (Tea Board of Kenya 2023; FAO 2022/2024), producing about 523,000 tonnes in 2023 with full domestic processing into made tea via about 66 KTDA factories and the Mombasa auction, the world's largest CTC tea auction. This satisfies every analytical test: a world-class resource and input base (volcanic equatorial highlands, 500,000-plus smallholders); a finished beneficiation stage rather than raw leaf; demonstrable cost and quality competitiveness, shown in a very high revealed comparative advantage and the global number-one export rank; and deliverability through Mombasa and the Northern Corridor. Critically, on the framework's "prize-is-biggest-where-Africa-imports-most" test, tea is not marginal within Africa — Egypt is Kenya's second-largest single destination after Pakistan, importing 86.90 million kg of Kenyan tea in 2024, with Sudan, Morocco and Ghana additional African buyers, and Africa the world's second-largest tea-importing region by value.

Three threats qualify the position and must be read honestly. First, much African tea demand — notably Morocco — is for green tea, which Kenya does not dominate. Second, the within-Africa-sourced share of African tea imports has fallen from about 55% in 2005 to about 40% by 2020 (FAO 2024) as extra-continental suppliers gain ground. Third, Kenya exports overwhelmingly in bulk — value-added tea was just 5% of exports in 2024 (28.90 million kg) — so the branded and bagged tier, where margins and substitution gains are largest, remains capturable by re-exporters in Dubai and the UK unless Kenya hits its 50%-by-2027 value-addition target. The two strongest industrial runners-up reinforce rather than replace tea: cement and clinker, where locally produced clinker is about 30% cheaper than imports and Kenya is already shifting from net importer to regional exporter into clinker-short East and Central Africa; and regional pharmaceuticals and generics, the largest substitution prize given that Africa imports 70-90% of its medicines, though Kenya formulates from imported APIs rather than making them.

Current reality

Kenya is an economy of approximately US$120 billion (GDP current US$, 2024, World Bank) and 56.43 million people (UN World Population Prospects 2024), structurally led by services and agriculture, with a manufacturing base that is diversified by regional standards but shallow in absolute terms at 7.6% of GDP (2023, World Bank). Manufacturing employs 352,654 people and is the largest private-sector employer (2023, KNBS). Many plants run at 50 to 70% capacity utilisation. On UNIDO's Competitive Industrial Performance Index Kenya ranked 115 of 152 (2020) — the top position within the EAC but well behind Egypt at 64 and South Africa at 52 — and its manufacturing export structure is 42.9% resource-based and only 5.5% high-tech. On UNCTAD's Productive Capacities Index it scored 30.8 in 2022, rank 149 of 193, above the sub-Saharan average of 27.9 but below South Africa and Egypt.

The honest constraint is that Kenya's strengths are real but thinly converted. Despite clean generation, transmission losses of around 16%, curtailment of 812.8 GWh in FY2023/24 and a small grid cap the industrial power that can actually be delivered, and effective industrial tariffs remain high. Mombasa and Northern Corridor congestion, non-tariff barriers and recurrent EAC trade disputes raise delivered cost, and Lamu/LAPSSET underperforms. Feedstock dependency runs through the industrial categories: pharmaceuticals formulate from imported active pharmaceutical ingredients, steel depends on imported billet and scrap, and edible oils on imported crude palm. The extractive base is thinner still following Base Titanium's wind-down of its Kwale operation through 2024, which removed the country's largest mineral exporter and halved titanium ore output from 198,469 tonnes in 2024 to 101,000 tonnes in 2025.

09 · The draft bundle
Draft 1 · 18 candidate lines · will change

Kenya’s provisional product bundle

This bundle is Draft 1 and is offered for correction. Each card shows a candidate product category, the HS codes inside it, the strength tier assessed from Kenya’s capability audit, and the gross continental import demand for that category in 2023. That figure is market context — what the whole continent buys, from all sources. It is never a statement of what Kenya will supply, and these figures are never added together.

Portfolio at a glance · strength-tier mix

How Kenya’s 18 candidate lines distribute across the strength tiers — the shape of the bundle before any allocation is settled.

Continental Anchor 2Strong Contender 6Emerging 6Aspirational 2Grey 2
CONTINENTAL ANCHOR

Established continental-scale capability.

STRONG CONTENDER

Substantial installed capability; competitive on the continent.

EMERGING

Capability present and growing; not yet at continental scale.

ASPIRATIONAL

A build, not present production. Demand certainty against which capability is created.

GREY

Endowment noted; capability not yet verified.

Pharmaceuticals (generics)

Largest EAC base; ~50% COMESA market; WHO-prequalified firms · Maturity: Formulation/packaging · Competitiveness: Very large (70-90% imported)
STRONG CONTENDER
USD 13.65 bngross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
300410Medicaments; containing penicillins, streptomycins or their derivatives, for therapeutic or prophylactic uses, packaged
300420Medicaments; containing antibiotics (other than penicillins, streptomycins or their derivatives), for therapeutic or pro
300431Medicaments; containing insulin, for therapeutic or prophylactic uses, packaged for retail sale
300432Medicaments; containing corticosteroid hormones, their derivatives or structural analogues (but not containing antibioti
300439Medicaments; containing hormones (but not insulin), adrenal cortex hormones or antibiotics, for therapeutic or prophylac
300440Medicaments containing alkaloids or derivatives thereof, not containing hormones, steroids...
300441Medicaments; containing alkaloids or their derivatives, containing ephedrine or its salts, for therapeutic or prophylact
300442Medicaments; containing alkaloids or their derivatives, containing pseudoephedrine (INN) or its salts, for therapeutic o
300443Medicaments; containing alkaloids or their derivatives, containing norephedrine or its salts, for therapeutic or prophyl
300449Medicaments; containing alkaloids or their derivatives; other than ephedrine, pseudoephedrine (INN) or norephedrine or t
300450Medicaments; containing vitamins or their derivatives, for therapeutic or prophylactic use, packaged for retail sale
300460Medicaments; containing antimalarial active principles described in Subheading Note 2 to this Chapter, for therapeutic o
300490Medicaments; consisting of mixed or unmixed products n.e.c. in heading no. 3004, for therapeutic or prophylactic uses, packaged for retail sale
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium–high
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 4 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.
Procuring agency (indicative): Central Medical Stores · Malaria Control · control: predominant. Indicative only — this is the government function that typically buys this category, not a tender-line identification.

Kenya imported USD 452.1 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Egypt USD 3.25 bnSouth Africa USD 1.72 bnAlgeria USD 841 mNigeria USD 593.9 mMorocco USD 554.5 mEthiopia USD 459.6 mKenya your own imports USD 452.1 mCote dIvoire USD 403.1 m

Kenya is itself among the leading continental importers of this category. That is the balance argument in one line: this is demand the state already pays for off-continent.

Source: EAC Plan; Brookings; KNBS · 2017-27; 2021

Gold

Migori belt artisanal; 329 kg · Maturity: Raw · Competitiveness: Large
GREY
USD 2.99 bngross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
710811Metals; gold, non-monetary, powder
710812Metals; gold, non-monetary, unwrought (but not powder)
710813Metals; gold, semi-manufactured
710820Gold, monetary
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 36 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 0 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Uganda USD 1.9 bnSouth Africa USD 668.4 mEgypt USD 139.2 mMorocco USD 59.6 mLibya USD 58.9 mTunisia USD 43.4 mAlgeria USD 43.4 mMauritius USD 36.1 m

Source: KNBS · 2026

Cement & clinker

~10Mt clinker/~16Mt grinding; cheap energy+limestone; ~30% cheaper than imports · Maturity: Finished/Intermediate · Competitiveness: Large (clinker-short E/C Africa)
STRONG CONTENDER
USD 2.9 bngross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
252310Cement clinkers (whether or not coloured)
252321Cement; portland, white, whether or not artificially coloured
252329Cement; portland, other than white, whether or not artificially coloured
252330Cement; aluminous (ciment fondu), whether or not coloured or in the form of clinkers
252390Cement; hydraulic kinds n.e.c. in heading no. 2523
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium–high
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 30 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 13.8 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Ghana USD 318.1 mMali USD 302.7 mCote dIvoire USD 273 mBurkina Faso USD 205.1 mLibya USD 166.4 mCameroon USD 144.9 mUganda USD 140.3 mMadagascar USD 78.9 m

Source: KAM; CemNet; KNBS · 2024-25; 2023

Iron & steel (rerolled)

Devki/Blue Nile/Tononoka; imported billet/scrap · Maturity: Intermediate · Competitiveness: Large regional
EMERGING
USD 1.61 bngross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
721410Iron or non-alloy steel; bars and rods, forged, hot-rolled, hot-drawn or hot-extruded, but including those twisted after
721420Iron or non-alloy steel; bars and rods, hot-rolled, hot-drawn or hot-extruded, containing indentations, ribs, grooves or
721430Iron or non-alloy steel; bars and rods, hot-rolled, hot-drawn or hot-extruded, including those twisted after rolling, of
721491Iron or non-alloy steel; bars and rods, hot-rolled, hot-drawn or hot-extruded, n.e.c. in heading no. 7214, of rectangula
721499Iron or non-alloy steel; bars and rods, hot-rolled, hot-drawn or hot-extruded, n.e.c. in heading no. 7214, other than of
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 3 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 1 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Djibouti USD 187.8 mSenegal USD 157.6 mEthiopia USD 151.7 mMozambique USD 89.1 mGuinea-Bissau USD 81.6 mMorocco USD 75.3 mSomalia USD 68.7 mGuinea USD 57.4 m

Source: USGS; EAC · 2019; 2023

Packaging (paper/plastics)

Light manufacturing; regional value-chain demand · Maturity: Finished · Competitiveness: Moderate regional
EMERGING
USD 1.21 bngross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
481910Paper and paperboard; cartons, boxes and cases, of corrugated paper or paperboard
481920Paper and paperboard; folding cartons, boxes and cases, of non-corrugated paper or paperboard
481930Paper and paperboard; sacks and bags of paper, paperboard, cellulose wadding or fibres, having a base of a width of 40cm
481940Paper and paperboard; sacks and bags, including cones, of paper, paperboard, cellulose wadding or fibres, having a base
481950Paper and paperboard; packing containers, including record sleeves, of paper, paperboard, cellulose wadding or fibres, n
481960Paper and paperboard; box files, letter trays, storage boxes and similar articles, used in offices, shops or the like of
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 2 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 30.6 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Algeria USD 121.3 mMorocco USD 104.7 mEgypt USD 103.6 mSouth Africa USD 102.5 mLibya USD 94.3 mSenegal USD 46 mGhana USD 43.9 mMozambique USD 41.4 m

Source: Atlas of Economic Complexity · 2023

Coffee (green, premium)

Premium Arabica; established RCA; ~US$246m · Maturity: Raw/semi-processed · Competitiveness: Marginal (extra-African)
STRONG CONTENDER
USD 1.13 bngross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
090111Coffee; not roasted or decaffeinated
090112Coffee; decaffeinated, not roasted
090121Coffee; roasted, not decaffeinated
090122Coffee; roasted, decaffeinated
090190Coffee; husks and skins, coffee substitutes containing coffee in any proportion
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium–high
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 12 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 8.2 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Algeria USD 322.4 mEgypt USD 217.4 mSudan USD 151.5 mMorocco USD 148 mSouth Africa USD 99.8 mLibya USD 77.7 mTunisia USD 34.5 mNamibia USD 9.7 m

Source: WITS/UN Comtrade · 2023

Soaps, cosmetics, detergents

Light manufacturing; soda ash linkage; EAC demand · Maturity: Finished · Competitiveness: Moderate regional
EMERGING
USD 1.12 bngross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
340111Soap and organic surface-active products; in the form of bars, cakes, moulded shapes, and paper, wadding, felt and nonwo
340119Soap and organic surface-active products; in the form of bars, cakes, moulded shapes, and paper, wadding, felt and nonwo
340120Soap; in forms n.e.c. in item no. 3401.11
340130Organic surface-active products and preparations for washing the skin, in the form of liquid or cream and put up for ret
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium

Kenya imported USD 9.2 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
South Africa USD 86.2 mSudan USD 83.4 mEthiopia USD 82.4 mGhana USD 72.1 mAngola USD 64.1 mTanzania USD 60 mMorocco USD 45.6 mBotswana USD 44.5 m

Source: ODI · 2021

Soda ash

Africa's largest producer (Tata Magadi); trona to soda ash · Maturity: Intermediate · Competitiveness: Moderate
STRONG CONTENDER
USD 946.5 mgross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
283610Commercial ammonium carbonate and other ammonium carbonates
283620Carbonates; disodium carbonate
283630Carbonates; sodium hydrogen carbonate (sodium bicarbonate)
283640Carbonates; potassium carbonate
283650Carbonates; calcium carbonate
283660Carbonates; barium carbonate
283670Lead carbonates
283691Carbonates; lithium carbonate
283692Carbonates; strontium carbonate
283699Carbonates; n.e.c. in heading no. 2836 and other than lithium or strontium
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium–high
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 5 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 16.5 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Egypt USD 203.3 mSouth Africa USD 201.3 mNigeria USD 107.6 mAlgeria USD 65.9 mMorocco USD 43.7 mTunisia USD 35.8 mTanzania USD 35.6 mEthiopia USD 29.1 m

Source: KNBS Economic Survey; Tata Chemicals · 2026/2025

Black tea (made/CTC)

World #1 black tea exporter; ~523kt; full CTC processing; Mombasa auction · Maturity: Finished · Competitiveness: Moderate-large (Egypt top-5 global importer; Sudan/Morocco/Ghana)
CONTINENTAL ANCHOR
USD 919 mgross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
090210Tea, green; (not fermented), in immediate packings of a content not exceeding 3kg
090220Tea, green; (not fermented), in immediate packings of a content exceeding 3kg
090230Tea, black; (fermented) and partly fermented tea, in immediate packings of a content not exceeding 3kg
090240Tea, black; (fermented) and partly fermented tea, in immediate packings of a content exceeding 3kg
Screening intensity · indicativeHigh
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 5 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 8.7 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Egypt USD 310.3 mMorocco USD 187.4 mLibya USD 73.5 mAlgeria USD 72.6 mSouth Africa USD 35.1 mSudan USD 33.4 mMali USD 24.2 mMauritania USD 22.4 m

Source: Tea Board of Kenya; FAO · 2023; 2022/2024

Beer & beverages

EABL/Diageo regional brewer; EAC exports · Maturity: Finished · Competitiveness: Moderate regional
STRONG CONTENDER
USD 533.9 mgross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
220300Beer; made from malt
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium–high
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 2 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 7.5 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
South Africa USD 132.2 mBotswana USD 50.2 mZambia USD 43.2 mSouth Sudan USD 28.8 mEquatorial Guinea USD 26.8 mMorocco USD 25.5 mDjibouti USD 20.8 mCote dIvoire USD 20.7 m

Source: ODI; EAC · 2021; 2023

Footwear/leather

Livestock base; nascent EPZ capacity · Maturity: Semi-processed · Competitiveness: Moderate regional
ASPIRATIONAL
USD 531.5 mgross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
640312Sports footwear; with outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather and uppers of leather, ski-boots,
640319Sports footwear; (other than ski-boots, snowboard boots or cross-country ski footwear), with outer soles of rubber, plas
640320Footwear; with outer soles of leather, uppers consisting of leather straps across instep and around the big toe
640330Footwear with leather uppers, made on a base or platform of wood, with neither an inner sole...
640340Footwear; with metal toe-cap, outer soles of rubber, plastics, leather or composition leather, uppers of leather
640351Footwear; n.e.c. in heading no. 6403, with outer soles and uppers of leather, covering the ankle
640359Footwear; n.e.c. in heading no. 6403, (not covering the ankle), outer soles and uppers of leather
640391Footwear; n.e.c. in heading no. 6403, covering the ankle, outer soles of rubber, plastics or composition leather, uppers
640399Footwear; n.e.c. in heading no. 6403, (not covering the ankle), outer soles of rubber, plastics or composition leather,
Screening intensity · indicativeBuilding
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 2 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 16.2 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
South Africa USD 225.5 mMorocco USD 34.6 mAlgeria USD 25.3 mLibya USD 25.1 mEgypt USD 17.5 mAngola USD 17.3 mKenya your own imports USD 16.2 mMozambique USD 14.8 m

Kenya is itself among the leading continental importers of this category. That is the balance argument in one line: this is demand the state already pays for off-continent.

Source: ODI · 2021

Avocado (fresh)

Africa's largest producer; 6th global · Maturity: Raw fresh · Competitiveness: Marginal (extra-African)
STRONG CONTENDER
USD 473.4 mgross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
080410Fruit, edible; dates, fresh or dried
080420Fruit, edible; figs, fresh or dried
080430Fruit, edible; pineapples, fresh or dried
080440Fruit, edible; avocados, fresh or dried
080450Fruit, edible; guavas, mangoes and mangosteens, fresh or dried
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium–high
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 7 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 3.5 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Morocco USD 267.6 mEgypt USD 35.2 mSomalia USD 30.2 mNigeria USD 28.1 mGhana USD 19.3 mSouth Africa USD 11.9 mMauritania USD 9.5 mDjibouti USD 8 m

Source: FAOSTAT; USDA FAS · 2023; 2024

Edible oils & fats

Bidco/Kapa processing; reliant on imported crude palm · Maturity: Finished (imported feedstock) · Competitiveness: Moderate-large regional
EMERGING
USD 467.6 mgross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
151710Margarine; excluding liquid margarine
151790Edible mixtures or preparations of animal, vegetable or microbial fats or oils or of fractions of different fats or oils
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium

Kenya imported USD 2.1 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Algeria USD 78.8 mMorocco USD 51.2 mGhana USD 41.6 mLibya USD 28.5 mNigeria USD 21.7 mUganda USD 20.5 mEgypt USD 18.5 mZambia USD 14.2 m

Source: ODI; WITS · 2021; 2023

Industrial lime

Limestone deposits; cement linkage · Maturity: Intermediate · Competitiveness: Moderate regional
EMERGING
USD 242.1 mgross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
252210Quicklime; excluding calcium oxide and hydroxide of heading no. 2825
252220Slaked lime; excluding calcium oxide and hydroxide of heading no. 2825
252230Hydraulic lime; excluding calcium oxide and hydroxide of heading no. 2825
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 2 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 1.8 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
DR Congo USD 86.3 mBurkina Faso USD 24 mZimbabwe USD 19.2 mGhana USD 17.6 mMali USD 15.5 mSouth Africa USD 13.6 mCote dIvoire USD 12.2 mGuinea USD 11.2 m

Source: USGS · 2019

Cut flowers/roses

World 3rd exporter; 38% EU rose share; equatorial highlands + JKIA · Maturity: Finished · Competitiveness: Marginal (EU-oriented)
CONTINENTAL ANCHOR
USD 30.5 mgross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
060310Fresh cut flowers and flower buds, for bouquets or for ornamental purposes
060311Flowers, cut; roses, flowers and buds of a kind suitable for bouquets or ornamental purposes, fresh
060312Flowers, cut; carnations, flowers and buds of a kind suitable for bouquets or ornamental purposes, fresh
060313Flowers, cut; orchids, flowers and buds of a kind suitable for bouquets or ornamental purposes, fresh
060314Flowers, cut; chrysanthemums, flowers and buds of a kind suitable for bouquets or ornamental purposes, fresh
060315Flowers, cut; lilies (Lilium spp.), flowers and flower buds of a kind suitable for bouquets or ornamental purposes, fres
060319Flowers, cut; flowers and buds of a kind suitable for bouquets or ornamental purposes, fresh, other than roses, carnatio
060390Flowers, cut; flowers and flower buds of a kind suitable for bouquets or ornamental purposes, dried, dyed, bleached, imp
Screening intensity · indicativeHigh
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 5 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 0 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
Libya USD 9.8 mEgypt USD 3.8 mSouth Africa USD 3.6 mMauritius USD 2 mMorocco USD 1.8 mAlgeria USD 1.6 mNamibia USD 1.4 mBotswana USD 1 m

Source: UN Comtrade/WITS; Kenya Flower Council · 2023

Titanium minerals

Kwale deposits; Base Titanium exited 2024; output halved · Maturity: Raw concentrate · Competitiveness: Marginal (global feedstock)
EMERGING
USD 13.1 mgross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
261400Titanium ores and concentrates
Screening intensity · indicativeMedium
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 7 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 0.1 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
South Africa USD 6.6 mEgypt USD 3.2 mMorocco USD 1.1 mAlgeria USD 1 mTunisia USD 0.4 mCameroon USD 0.3 mEthiopia USD 0.2 mKenya your own imports USD 0.1 m

Kenya is itself among the leading continental importers of this category. That is the balance argument in one line: this is demand the state already pays for off-continent.

Source: USGS; KNBS · 2024/25; 2026

Gemstones

Tsavorite/ruby endowment; 2.17m carats rough · Maturity: Raw · Competitiveness: Niche
GREY
USD 11.9 mgross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim
710310Stones; precious (other than diamonds) and semi-precious stones, unworked or simply sawn or roughly shaped, not strung,
710391Stones; rubies, sapphires and emeralds, worked (other than simply sawn or roughly shaped), not strung, mounted or set
710399Stones; precious (other than diamonds) and semi-precious stones, (other than rubies, sapphires and emeralds), worked oth
Shared demand at Draft 1. This line is currently claimed by 5 member states. The figure shown is gross continental demand for the category, not a quantity available to any one of them. Allocation between the claiming states is unresolved and is exactly what Draft 2 must settle.

Kenya imported USD 0 m of this category in 2023.

Leading importing states · gross 2023
South Africa USD 9.5 mMauritius USD 0.9 mMorocco USD 0.4 mEgypt USD 0.3 mTunisia USD 0.3 mZambia USD 0.2 mNamibia USD 0.1 m

Source: KNBS · 2026

ICT/fintech services

Silicon Savannah; regional tech hub · Maturity: Finished services · Competitiveness: Large regional
ASPIRATIONAL
GREY — verification pendinggross continental import demand · 2023 · market context, not a supply claim

Source: SDK.finance · 2024

Per-line values are gross 2023 continental import demand from UN Comtrade via the Africa Trade Intelligence Master Database v3. The screening intensity on each card is a qualitative indicator only — how strongly the government and off-continent screens are likely to apply, read from the strength tier. It is deliberately not a monetary figure: the addressable value is measured only after the bilateral trade re-pull at Draft 2. Lines marked as shared are claimed by more than one member state at Draft 1; allocation between them is unresolved. Lines marked GREY carry an endowment that is noted but not yet verified. No total is presented for this bundle: summing overlapping candidate lines would produce a meaningless figure, and the claim value for Kenya is resolved only at Draft 2.

10 · Balance
What Kenya buys, beside what it might make

The fairness test runs in both directions

A right to supply is only fair if it is sized near what the member itself buys. This is the honest counterweight: Kenya is a buyer in this system before it is a supplier, and its own import bill is the anchor against which any future claim is sized.

USD 18.71 bn

Kenya’s total merchandise imports, 2023. Every line below is measured against this, not against the continental figure.

18

Candidate lines in the Draft 1 bundle. The number of lines is not a measure of value.

1

Lines whose figure is still pending verification and is rendered GREY rather than estimated.

Candidate product lineStrength tierKenya imports, 2023Continental demand, 2023
Pharmaceuticals (generics)STRONG CONTENDERUSD 452.1 mUSD 13.65 bn
Packaging (paper/plastics)EMERGINGUSD 30.6 mUSD 1.21 bn
Soda ashSTRONG CONTENDERUSD 16.5 mUSD 946.5 m
Footwear/leatherASPIRATIONALUSD 16.2 mUSD 531.5 m
Cement & clinkerSTRONG CONTENDERUSD 13.8 mUSD 2.9 bn
Soaps, cosmetics, detergentsEMERGINGUSD 9.2 mUSD 1.12 bn
Black tea (made/CTC)CONTINENTAL ANCHORUSD 8.7 mUSD 919 m
Coffee (green, premium)STRONG CONTENDERUSD 8.2 mUSD 1.13 bn
Beer & beveragesSTRONG CONTENDERUSD 7.5 mUSD 533.9 m
Avocado (fresh)STRONG CONTENDERUSD 3.5 mUSD 473.4 m
Edible oils & fatsEMERGINGUSD 2.1 mUSD 467.6 m
Industrial limeEMERGINGUSD 1.8 mUSD 242.1 m
Iron & steel (rerolled)EMERGINGUSD 1 mUSD 1.61 bn
Titanium mineralsEMERGINGUSD 0.1 mUSD 13.1 m

Left-hand column: what Kenya itself imported in this category in 2023. Right-hand column: gross continental import demand for the same category — market context only. The two columns are deliberately not netted: doing so before allocation is resolved would imply a claim that Draft 1 does not make.

11 · Proportion
The number this document refuses to print

What Kenya’s claim is worth is not yet known

At this point a document of this kind normally states a headline: what the allocation is worth to the country. Draft 1 does not, and the reason is the most important methodological statement in these pages.

Why there is no headline figure here

The bundle contains 18 candidate lines. Each carries a gross continental demand figure. Adding them would produce a number, and that number would be worthless — in several cases many times Kenya’s entire economy. It would be worthless for three reasons, each of them sufficient on its own.

Overlap

Lines are claimed by several member states at Draft 1. The same continental demand would be counted once for each claimant.

Gross, not addressable

These are total continental imports from all sources — before the government, off-continent, industrial and balance screens are applied.

Allocation unresolved

No share of any line has been assigned to Kenya. Until allocation is settled there is no quantity to value.

Capability, not entitlement

Aspirational and GREY lines describe a build or an unverified endowment, not present production that could be sold next year.

So the figure is stated the only honest way it can be at this stage: GREY — verification pending. It is produced at Draft 2, after the screens and after allocation, and it will be smaller than any sum of the cards above. A minister who is shown a large headline today is being shown an artefact of double-counting, not a prospect.

GREY — verification pending

Kenya’s claim value. Resolved at Draft 2, after screens and allocation.

25 years

The allocation horizon that can make a plant financeable — subject to Match-or-Release on every single order.

10% → 100%

Local-content ramp over ten years. Local content means made anywhere on the African continent.

12 · Demand map
Who buys these categories today

The continental buyers behind Kenya’s draft bundle

Where the demand for these product categories actually sits, ranked by 2023 gross imports. This is the customer book the instrument would open — the states that currently buy these goods from outside the continent.

Leading importing states across the bundle

Gross USD · 2023
01EgyptUSD 4.3 bn
02South AfricaUSD 3.31 bn
03UgandaUSD 2.06 bn
04MoroccoUSD 1.6 bn
05AlgeriaUSD 1.57 bn
06NigeriaUSD 751.3 m
07EthiopiaUSD 723 m
08Cote dIvoireUSD 709 m
09LibyaUSD 534.2 m
10GhanaUSD 512.6 m
11KenyaUSD 468.4 m
12MaliUSD 342.4 m
13SudanUSD 268.3 m
14Burkina FasoUSD 229.1 m
15DjiboutiUSD 216.6 m

Read this as a market map, not a claim. These values are the sum of gross continental imports across the candidate categories, shown to indicate where demand is concentrated. Because candidate lines overlap between member states and precede the screens, this ranking indicates the shape of the market and not revenue available to Kenya. Bar widths are relative to the leading state.

13 · Due diligence
What would have to be true

The conditions Kenya would have to meet

A supply right is only as good as the capability behind it. These are the conditions the audit says must hold for Kenya to deliver — printed here, not buried, because a room of finance ministers will ask.

01

Tea value-addition climbs off the bulk floor

Kenya invests in blending, bagging, instant-tea and branding capacity to move from bulk commodity (95% of exports in 2024) toward its 50%-value-added-by-2027 target, and secures and diversifies African off-take beyond Egypt and Sudan rather than ceding value-added segments to re-exporters in Dubai and the UK.

02

Announced clinker capacity is commissioned and run near capacity

The announced clinker capacity (10 to about 15 Mt) is commissioned and run near capacity, with energy and transport costs staying low enough to land competitively in DRC, Uganda, Rwanda and South Sudan, and cross-border levies and NTBs resolved under AfCFTA.

03

Pharma moves up-chain

Kenya moves into selected API, sterile and injectable production, achieves WHO-prequalification at scale, and benefits from AU/Africa CDC pooled-procurement preference for African-made essential medicines.

04

Reliable, affordably-priced industrial power

Despite the small grid, transmission losses and curtailment, industrial power is delivered reliably and at an affordable price to underpin green industrialisation.

05

AfCFTA rules of origin reward Kenyan value-addition

Functioning AfCFTA rules-of-origin reward Kenyan value-addition, so that finishing in Kenya qualifies for preferential continental access rather than being disqualified by imported-feedstock content.

06

Corridor efficiency and feedstock dependence resolved

Northern Corridor efficiency gains are realised and feedstock import dependence — imported APIs for pharma, billet and scrap for steel, and crude palm for edible oils — is reduced.

The binding constraints
·

Power cost and reliability Despite clean generation, about 16% transmission losses, curtailment and a small grid limit deliverable industrial power, and effective industrial tariffs remain high.

·

Logistics and corridor friction Mombasa and Northern Corridor congestion, non-tariff barriers and recurrent EAC trade disputes raise delivered cost, and the Lamu/LAPSSET corridor underperforms.

·

Feedstock dependency Pharmaceuticals depend on imported APIs (more than 95% of African APIs are imported), steel on imported billet and scrap, and edible oils on imported crude palm — eroding cost-competitiveness and rules-of-origin qualification.

·

Capital and scale Manufacturing is shallow at 7.6% of GDP, and many plants run at only 50-70% capacity utilisation.

·

Single-buyer and concentration risk Cut flowers are EU-concentrated and tea revenue is exposed to a few markets, notably Pakistan and Egypt.

·

Mineral cliff and cost of doing business Base Titanium's exit removed the largest mineral exporter, exposing the thinness of the extractive base, while elevated input, finance and compliance costs weigh on the broader cost of doing business.

13 · Devil’s advocate
Surfaced, not buried

Where this could still be wrong

01

This bundle is Draft 1, and several of its lines are contested. Lines flagged as shared are claimed by more than one member state. Draft 1 deliberately shows the conflict rather than silently resolving it in Kenya’s favour.

02

Gross continental demand is not addressable demand. Every figure on the bundle pages precedes the government, off-continent, industrial and balance screens. The addressable figure will be materially smaller.

03

A strength tier is a judgement, not a measurement. Tiers are assessed from the capability audit. Reasonable people can disagree, and the Minister’s correction of a tier is precisely the input Draft 2 needs.

04

Deliverable industrial power is smaller than the clean-energy headline suggests. Despite renewables supplying roughly 85 to 90% of electricity, transmission losses of around 16%, curtailment of 812.8 GWh in FY2023/24 and a small grid cap the power that can actually reach industry, and effective industrial tariffs remain high. The general condition for delivery is reliable, affordably priced industrial power.

05

Corridor friction erodes the logistics advantage. Mombasa and Northern Corridor congestion, non-tariff barriers and recurrent EAC trade disputes raise delivered cost, and Lamu/LAPSSET underperforms. Corridor efficiency gains are a stated precondition for delivery.

06

Feedstock dependency runs through the industrial categories. More than 95% of African active pharmaceutical ingredients are imported, steel depends on imported billet and scrap, and edible oils on imported crude palm. The audit identifies this as eroding both cost-competitiveness and rules-of-origin qualification under AfCFTA.

07

The manufacturing base is shallow and under-run. Manufacturing is 7.6% of GDP and many plants operate at 50 to 70% capacity utilisation. For clinker, the announced expansion from roughly 10 Mt to about 15 Mt would have to be commissioned and run near capacity to hold the position.

08

Concentration risk sits on the two flagship exports. Cut flowers are EU-concentrated and tea revenue is exposed to a small number of markets, principally Pakistan and Egypt. Securing and diversifying African off-take beyond Egypt and Sudan is a stated condition for the tea position.

09

The extractive base has just thinned. Base Titanium's exit removed the largest mineral exporter, exposing the thinness of the extractive base. Outside soda ash, Kenya holds modest mineral endowment with negligible beneficiation, and fluorspar, rare earths, niobium and coal remain dormant or undeveloped.

10

Value addition remains the unmet condition on the trump card. Value-added tea was 28.90 million kg in 2024, just 5% of total tea exports, against a government target of 50% by 2027. Without blending, bagging, instant-tea and branding capacity, the margin tier remains capturable by re-exporters in Dubai and the United Kingdom.

14 · Synthesis
The honest read

A fixed prize, a draft bundle, and a decision that belongs to the Minister

The prize is USD 620 bn — the goods Africa buys each year from outside the continent, out of USD 709 bn of total imports, against roughly USD 89 bn traded within Africa today. The instrument begins where a signature can move demand: USD 136.75 bn of measured government procurement, inside an estimated USD 207 bn that government influences. That spine is fixed.

Kenya's Draft 1 bundle rests on three things the audit documents rather than asserts: a finished-goods tea position that is first in the world and processed at home; a geothermal-anchored, near-fully-renewable power system of 943.7 MW installed geothermal supplying 41.71% of grid energy; and a coastal gateway at Mombasa handling 1.62 million TEU into a Northern Corridor hinterland of more than 120 million people, behind which sits East Africa's most diversified manufacturing base in cement and clinker, pharmaceuticals and light manufactures sold regionally. What must be proven is conversion. Kenya would have to build blending, bagging, instant-tea and branding capacity to move tea from bulk commodity toward its 50%-value-added-by-2027 target and diversify African off-take; commission and run the announced clinker capacity near capacity with energy and transport costs low enough to land competitively in the DRC, Uganda, Rwanda and South Sudan under resolved AfCFTA rules of origin; move pharmaceuticals up-chain into selected active-ingredient, sterile and injectable production with prequalification at scale and continental pooled-procurement preference; and resolve the underlying conditions of affordable industrial power, corridor efficiency and feedstock import dependence on which all three depend.

What is not fixed is the bundle. Kenya is shown 18 candidate product lines, drawn from its own capability audit, with gross continental demand given as market context and no claim value stated. Lines contested by other member states are marked as contested. Lines whose endowment is unverified are marked GREY rather than estimated.

The strength of this document is what it declines to do. It does not add its own cards together. It does not convert an endowment into a promise. It does not ask Kenya to surrender procurement autonomy, because Match-or-Release means the buyer can walk away from the designated supplier on any order, on the same day, without penalty. What it asks for is one hour of the Minister’s correction — and that correction is the next step of the method, not an objection to it.

15 · Your response
The correction is the method

Seven marks on the page, and the reply that produces Draft 2